Richard Stockton College Athletic Training

Outcome Survey of Athletic Injury Care
Approximately 50% of athletes who complete their rehab are surveyed regarding their
athletic injury experience at Stockton.  The Survey's are anonymous.


 
Primary Links
Home
Comeback Athletes
Certified Staff
Insurance Info
Visiting Team Info
Student Staff
Former Staff
Published Articles
Our Links
Outside Links
Athletic Injuries



Secondary Links
Newsletter
Sports Nutrition Archive
Rehab in Action
Rehab Wall of Fame
The ACL Page
Concussion Page
Athletic Training Survey
Quotes
Sports Medicine Symposium
Athletic Injury Update
Rehab Archives


2008-09 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 1.95 2.09 2.02
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.84 3.52 3.68

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.78 3.77 3.8
2.Size is adequate 3.69 3.67 3.71
3.Equipment is adequate 3.75 3.878 3.71
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.85 3.81 3.9
2.Wait was minimal 3.85 3.82 3.88
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.85 3.89 3.78
4.Concerns were addressed 3.88 3.90 3.84
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.84 3.92 3.73
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.83 3.86 3.78
7. Progress was monitored 3.9 3.92 3.88
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.71 3.75 3.65
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.31 1.22 1.45
3.Confident Return to play 3.74 3.52 3.25
4.Had input in your injury care 3.84 3.88 3.78
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.71 3.77 3.62
6.Staff answered questions 3.82 3.88 3.74
7.Staff is dependable 3.82 3.88 3.75
8.Staff is valuable 3.88 3.92 3.82
9.Pushed to work hard 3.60 3.73 3.43
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.88 3.9 3.84
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.77 3.78 3.76
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.04 1.93 2.12
13.Condition was followed up 3.67 3.67 3.66
14.Care was satisfactory 3.74 3.79 3.69
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.19 1.11 1.31
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.85 3.93 3.74
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.22 9.37 9



2007-08 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery

Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 2.08 1.98 2.02
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.77 3.6 3.68

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.8 3.78 3.83
2.Size is adequate 3.7 3.6 3.77
3.Equipment is adequate 3.81 3.82 3.79
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.86 3.88 3.83
2.Wait was minimal 3.84 3.85 3.83
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.87 3.88 3.87
4.Concerns were addressed 3.87 3.90 3.83
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.89 3.93 3.83
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.87 3.90 3.83
7. Progress was monitored 3.89 3.93 3.83
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.77 3.78 3.75
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.35 1.27 1.46
3.Confident Return to play 3.52 3.61 3.52
4.Had input in your injury care 3.83 3.88 3.77
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.75 3.75 3.71
6.Staff answered questions 3.79 3.83 3.75
7.Staff is dependable 3.84 3.88 3.79
8.Staff is valuable 3.83 3.88 3.77
9.Pushed to work hard 3.60 3.60 3.60
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.81 3.82 3.81
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.75 3.69 3.83
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.32 2.21 2.47
13.Condition was followed up 3.63 3.67 3.57
14.Care was satisfactory 3.71 3.77 3.68
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.18 1.08 1.30
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.80 3.85 3.74
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.37 9.40 9.33


2006-07 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 2.06 1.86 2.27
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.67 3.53 3.80

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.73 3.71 3.77
2.Size is adequate 3.77 3.73 3.83
3.Equipment is adequate 3.78 3.78 3.80
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.79 3.78 3.83
2.Wait was minimal 3.81 3.80 3.83
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.83 3.73 4.00
4.Concerns were addressed 3.86 3.82 3.93
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.89 3.84 3.97
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.85 3.82 3.90
7. Progress was monitored 3.87 3.86 3.90
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.78 3.78 3.80
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.22 1.22 1.21
3.Confident Return to play 3.51 3.40 3.70
4.Had input in your injury care 3.84 3.84 3.83
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.63 3.63 3.63
6.Staff answered questions 3.77 3.73 3.83
7.Staff is dependable 3.84 3.80 3.90
8.Staff is valuable 3.85 3.82 3.90
9.Pushed to work hard 3.60 3.57 3.62
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.85 3.82 3.90
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.75 3.65 3.90
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.15 2.10 2.23
13.Condition was followed up 3.62 3.65 3.57
14.Care was satisfactory 3.72 3.71 3.72
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.11 1.10 1.13
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.82 3.82 3.83
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.22 9.12 9.40


2005-06 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 1.97 1.80 2.15
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.78 3.80 3.74

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.74 3.76 3.70
2.Size is adequate 3.79 3.86 3.65
3.Equipment is adequate 3.81 3.84 3.75
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.82 3.92 3.65
2.Wait was minimal 3.75 3.73 3.80
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.68 3.68 3.70
4.Concerns were addressed 3.73 3.76 3.68
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.81 3.84 3.75
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.71 3.72 3.65
7. Progress was monitored 3.77 3.78 3.75
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.67 3.70 3.60
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.32 1.24 1.45
3.Confident Return to play 3.51 3.63 3.32
4.Had input in your injury care 3.65 3.68 3.60
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.60 3.59 3.60
6.Staff answered questions 3.75 3.78 3.68
7.Staff is dependable 3.68 3.73 3.60
8.Staff is valuable 3.68 3.73 3.60
9.Pushed to work hard 3.54 3.68 3.40
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.77 3.81 3.68
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.77 3.81 3.70
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.25 3.29 2.20
13.Condition was followed up 3.54 3.59 3.44
14.Care was satisfactory 3.60 3.76 3.40
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.18 1.16 1.20
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.68 3.73 3.60
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 8.91 8.94 8.86


2004-05 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 2.00 1.92 2.08
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.50 3.44 3.56

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.68 3.56 3.79
2.Size is adequate 3.74 3.75 3.73
3.Equipment is adequate 3.74 3.72 3.76
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.77 3.69 3.85
2.Wait was minimal 3.74 3.66 3.82
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.72 3.66 3.79
4.Concerns were addressed 3.72 3.69 3.73
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.75 3.75 3.73
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.72 3.69 3.76
7. Progress was monitored 3.77 3.75 3.79
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.66 3.63 3.70
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.29 1.29 1.29
3.Confident Return to play 3.47 3.39 3.55
4.Had input in your injury care 3.66 3.65 3.67
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.47 3.50 3.44
6.Staff answered questions 3.66 3.69 3.64
7.Staff is dependable 3.68 3.59 3.76
8.Staff is valuable 3.68 3.66 3.70
9.Pushed to work hard 3.42 3.53 3.36
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.68 3.69 3.67
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.64 3.52 3.76
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.19 2.03 2.34
13.Condition was followed up 3.54 3.55 3.53
14.Care was satisfactory 3.58 3.59 3.64
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.11 1.03 1.18
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.66 3.66 3.67
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.06 9.08 9.04


2003-04 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 1.93 2.05 1.86
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.51 3.60 3.41

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.70 3.71 3.69
2.Size is adequate 3.83 3.88 3.77
3.Equipment is adequate 3.84 3.90 3.76
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.87 3.88 3.86
2.Wait was minimal 3.81 3.79 3.83
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.88 3.95 3.80
4.Concerns were addressed 3.86 3.90 3.80
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.87 3.90 3.83
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.86 3.90 3.82
7. Progress was monitored 3.81 3.93 3.74
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.79 3.79 3.79
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.28 1.24 1.31
3.Confident Return to play 3.63 3.57 3.67
4.Had input in your injury care 3.84 3.93 3.74
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.67 3.71 3.57
6.Staff answered questions 3.78 3.86 3.68
7.Staff is dependable 3.81 3.90 3.69
8.Staff is valuable 3.86 3.93 3.77
9.Pushed to work hard 3.70 3.65 3.74
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.82 3.86 3.77
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.79 3.80 3.77
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.26 2.16 2.38
13.Condition was followed up 3.58 3.59 3.56
14.Care was satisfactory 3.78 3.95 3.63
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.09 1.00 1.21
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.78 3.83 3.71
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.16 9.24 9.06


2002-03 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 2.00 2.00 2.00
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.47 3.42 3.51

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.86 3.84 3.89
2.Size is adequate 3.80 3.86 3.71
3.Equipment is adequate 3.83 3.86 3.79
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.92 3.91 3.93
2.Wait was minimal 3.76 3.79 3.72
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.86 3.86 3.83
4.Concerns were addressed 3.80 3.86 3.71
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.82 3.88 3.71
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.81 3.86 3.75
7.Progress was monitored 3.87 3.88 3.89
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.62 3.53 3.75
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.39 1.38 1.39
3.Confident Return to play 3.29 3.31 3.25
4.Had input in your injury care 3.76 3.79 3.71
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.65 3.60 3.61
6.Staff answered questions 3.75 3.79 3.68
7.Staff is dependable 3.77 3.81 3.71
8.Staff is valuable 3.75 3.77 3.71
9.Pushed to work hard 3.42 3.49 3.32
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.72 3.79 3.61
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.70 3.62 3.81
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 1.91 1.88 1.96
13.Condition was followed up 3.51 3.51 3.50
14.Care was satisfactory 3.63 3.62 3.65
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.10 1.12 1.09
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.82 3.79 3.86
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.1 9.1 9.1


2001-02 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 2.00 2.00 2.00
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.47 3.51 3.47

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.87 3.83 3.91
2.Size is adequate 3.91 3.90 3.91
3.Equipment is adequate 3.91 3.93 3.89
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.92 3.93 3.91
2.Wait was minimal 3.83 3.88 3.78
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.89 3.95 3.83
4.Concerns were addressed 3.80 3.90 3.68
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.93 3.95 3.91
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.86 3.95 3.75
7.Progress was monitored 3.83 3.93 3.77
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.52 3.60 3.49
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.28 1.25 1.32
3.Confident Return to play 3.38 3.50 3.35
4.Had input in your injury care 3.85 3.88 3.83
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.68 3.78 3.57
6.Staff answered questions 3.83 3.85 3.80
7.Staff is dependable 3.83 3.85 3.79
8.Staff is valuable 3.87 3.93 3.79
9.Pushed to work hard 3.56 3.63 3.47
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.75 3.83 3.68
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.74 3.85 3.62
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.19 2.43 1.91
13.Condition was followed up 3.61 3.63 3.58
14.Care was satisfactory 3.61 3.80 3.53
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.05 1.07 1.03
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.88 3.90 3.85
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.3 9.2 9.3



2000-01 Results
(First Survey Results from the New Athletic Training Facility)
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 1.91 2.09 1.75
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.68 3.77 3.60

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.77 3.81 3.73
2.Size is adequate 3.90 3.92 3.88
3.Equipment is adequate 3.87 3.89 3.85
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.88 3.91 3.85
2.Wait was minimal 3.82 3.86 3.78
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.89 3.91 3.88
4.Concerns were addressed 3.83 3.83 3.83
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.87 3.91 3.83
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.84 3.88 3.80
7.Progress was monitored 3.90 3.97 3.88
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.83 3.81 3.85
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.09 1.11 1.07
3.Confident Return to play 3.63 3.55 3.76
4.Had input in your injury care 3.84 3.89 3.80
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.68 3.75 3.61
6.Staff answered questions 3.81 3.83 3.78
7.Staff is dependable 3.83 3.86 3.80
8.Staff is valuable 3.87 3.89 3.85
9.Pushed to work hard 3.66 3.61 3.71
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.75 3.69 3.83
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.88 3.91 3.85
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.12 2.00 2.22
13.Condition was followed up 3.57 3.56 3.58
14.Care was satisfactory 3.78 3.86 3.76
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.09 1.08 1.10
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.74 3.83 3.66
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.3 9.2 9.3


1999-00 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
Topic
Total Score Women Men
Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity 1.82 1.86 1.75
Post-Rehab rating of injury severity 3.57 3.56 3.58

Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.59 3.53 3.64
2.Size is adequate 3.00 2.95 3.08
3.Equipment is adequate 3.29 3.27 3.33
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.86 3.88 3.85
2.Wait was minimal 3.76 3.75 3.78
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.80 3.86 3.73
4.Concerns were addressed 3.81 3.82 3.80
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.83 3.84 3.82
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.84 3.91 3.75
7.Progress was monitored 3.76 3.91 3.73
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.74 3.68 3.83
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.23 1.27 1.16
3.Confident Return to play 3.34 3.40 3.34
4.Had input in your injury care 3.73 3.77 3.68
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.70 3.64 3.53
6.Staff answered questions 3.70 3.73 3.65
7.Staff is dependable 3.65 3.64 3.67
8.Staff is valuable 3.73 3.79 3.64
9.Pushed to work hard 3.44 3.54 3.30
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.75 3.79 3.70
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.68 3.67 3.70
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.15 2.07 2.26
13.Condition was followed up 3.55 3.59 3.50
14.Care was satisfactory 3.67 3.70 3.63
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.18 1.15 1.23
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.69 3.71 3.67
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.0 9.0 9.0
Top


1998-99 Results
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Total Score
Women
Men
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.53 3.43 3.67
2.Size is adequate 3.08 3.03 3.15
3.Equipment is adequate 3.31 3.27 3.37
Evaluations-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.83 3.84 3.81
2.Wait was minimal 3.70 3.73 3.67
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.78 3.86 3.67
4.Concerns were addressed 3.80 3.78 3.81
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.80 3.81 3.78
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.80 3.86 3.70
7.Progress was monitored 3.81 3.92 3.67
Rehabilitation-
Total Score
Women
Men
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.73 3.70 3.78
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.30 1.35 1.23
3.Confident Return to play 3.34 3.34 3.37
4.Had input in your injury care 3.70 3.73 3.67
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.61 3.68 3.52
6.Staff answered questions 3.69 3.73 3.63
7.Staff is dependable 3.65 3.68 3.62
8.Staff is valuable 3.73 3.84 3.58
9.Pushed to work hard 3.42 3.49 3.33
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.73 3.70 3.78
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.71 3.75 3.67
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.21 2.08 2.38
13.Condition was followed up 3.54 3.54 3.54
14.Care was satisfactory 3.69 3.73 3.63
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.22 1.19 1.26
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.65 3.68 3.62
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.0 9.0 9.0
Top
  

1997-98 Results
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4.  4.00 represents a perfect 
score for a question, unless noted otherwise.
Topic
Score
Athletic Training Room-
1.Hours are convenient 3.41
2.Size is adequate 1.93
3.Equipment is adequate 3.44
Evaluations-
Score
1.Prompt Initial Care 3.93
2.Wait was minimal 3.80
3.Thorough injury assessment 3.76
4.Concerns were addressed 3.74
5.Began a corrective plan of action 3.80
6.Re-evaluated at a later date 3.81
7.Progress was monitored 3.78
Rehabilitation-
Score
1.Rehab was beneficial 3.67
2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) 1.12
3.Confident Return to play 3.39
4.Had input in your injury care 3.72
5.Rehab was monitored and adapted 3.63
6.Staff answered questions 3.84
7.Staff is dependable 3.70
8.Staff is valuable 3.70
9.Pushed to work hard 3.51
10.Instructed on rehab exercises 3.75
11.Improved from initial injury state 3.66
12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) 2.06
13.Condition was followed up 3.52
14.Care was satisfactory 3.51
15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) 1.06
16.Enjoyable atmosphere 3.74
Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) 9.1
Top
   
   
Questions or comments regarding the Athletic Training Pages should be directed to 
Jon Heck at: