| Primary Links |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary Links |
|
|
|
2008-09 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their
injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
1.95 |
2.09 |
2.02 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.84 |
3.52 |
3.68 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00 represents
a perfect
score for a question, unless noted
otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours are convenient |
3.78 |
3.77 |
3.8 |
| 2.Size is adequate |
3.69 |
3.67 |
3.71 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.75 |
3.878 |
3.71 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.85 |
3.81 |
3.9 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.85 |
3.82 |
3.88 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.85 |
3.89 |
3.78 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.88 |
3.90 |
3.84 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.84 |
3.92 |
3.73 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.83 |
3.86 |
3.78 |
| 7. Progress was monitored |
3.9 |
3.92 |
3.88 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.71 |
3.75 |
3.65 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.31 |
1.22 |
1.45 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.74 |
3.52 |
3.25 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.84 |
3.88 |
3.78 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.71 |
3.77 |
3.62 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.82 |
3.88 |
3.74 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.82 |
3.88 |
3.75 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.88 |
3.92 |
3.82 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.60 |
3.73 |
3.43 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.88 |
3.9 |
3.84 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.77 |
3.78 |
3.76 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.04 |
1.93 |
2.12 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.67 |
3.67 |
3.66 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.74 |
3.79 |
3.69 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.19 |
1.11 |
1.31 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.85 |
3.93 |
3.74 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.22 |
9.37 |
9 |
2007-08
Results
Athletes
were asked to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
2.08 |
1.98 |
2.02 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.77 |
3.6 |
3.68 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00 represents
a perfect
score for a question, unless noted
otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours are convenient |
3.8 |
3.78 |
3.83 |
| 2.Size is adequate |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.77 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.81 |
3.82 |
3.79 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.86 |
3.88 |
3.83 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.84 |
3.85 |
3.83 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.87 |
3.88 |
3.87 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.87 |
3.90 |
3.83 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.89 |
3.93 |
3.83 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.87 |
3.90 |
3.83 |
| 7. Progress was monitored |
3.89 |
3.93 |
3.83 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.77 |
3.78 |
3.75 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.35 |
1.27 |
1.46 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.52 |
3.61 |
3.52 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.83 |
3.88 |
3.77 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.75 |
3.75 |
3.71 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.79 |
3.83 |
3.75 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.84 |
3.88 |
3.79 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.83 |
3.88 |
3.77 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.60 |
3.60 |
3.60 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.81 |
3.82 |
3.81 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.75 |
3.69 |
3.83 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.32 |
2.21 |
2.47 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.63 |
3.67 |
3.57 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.71 |
3.77 |
3.68 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.18 |
1.08 |
1.30 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.80 |
3.85 |
3.74 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.37 |
9.40 |
9.33 |
2006-07 Results
Athletes were asked to rate their
injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
2.06 |
1.86 |
2.27 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.67 |
3.53 |
3.80 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00 represents
a perfect
score for a question, unless noted
otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours are convenient |
3.73 |
3.71 |
3.77 |
| 2.Size is adequate |
3.77 |
3.73 |
3.83 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.78 |
3.78 |
3.80 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.79 |
3.78 |
3.83 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.81 |
3.80 |
3.83 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.83 |
3.73 |
4.00 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.86 |
3.82 |
3.93 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.89 |
3.84 |
3.97 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.85 |
3.82 |
3.90 |
| 7. Progress was monitored |
3.87 |
3.86 |
3.90 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.78 |
3.78 |
3.80 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.22 |
1.22 |
1.21 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.51 |
3.40 |
3.70 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.84 |
3.84 |
3.83 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.63 |
3.63 |
3.63 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.77 |
3.73 |
3.83 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.84 |
3.80 |
3.90 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.85 |
3.82 |
3.90 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.60 |
3.57 |
3.62 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.85 |
3.82 |
3.90 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.75 |
3.65 |
3.90 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.15 |
2.10 |
2.23 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.62 |
3.65 |
3.57 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.72 |
3.71 |
3.72 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.11 |
1.10 |
1.13 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.82 |
3.82 |
3.83 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.22 |
9.12 |
9.40 |
2005-06 Results
Athletes were asked
to rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score
|
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
1.97 |
1.80 |
2.15 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.78 |
3.80 |
3.74 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00
represents a perfect
score for a question,
unless noted otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours
are convenient |
3.74 |
3.76 |
3.70 |
| 2.Size
is adequate |
3.79 |
3.86 |
3.65 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.81 |
3.84 |
3.75 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.82 |
3.92 |
3.65 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.75 |
3.73 |
3.80 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.68 |
3.68 |
3.70 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.73 |
3.76 |
3.68 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.81 |
3.84 |
3.75 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.71 |
3.72 |
3.65 |
| 7. Progress was monitored |
3.77 |
3.78 |
3.75 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.67 |
3.70 |
3.60 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.32 |
1.24 |
1.45 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.51 |
3.63 |
3.32 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.65 |
3.68 |
3.60 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.60 |
3.59 |
3.60 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.75 |
3.78 |
3.68 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.68 |
3.73 |
3.60 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.68 |
3.73 |
3.60 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.54 |
3.68 |
3.40 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.77 |
3.81 |
3.68 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.77 |
3.81 |
3.70 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.25 |
3.29 |
2.20 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.54 |
3.59 |
3.44 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.60 |
3.76 |
3.40 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.18 |
1.16 |
1.20 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.68 |
3.73 |
3.60 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
8.91 |
8.94 |
8.86 |
2004-05 Results
Athletes were asked to
rate their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score
|
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
2.00 |
1.92 |
2.08 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.50 |
3.44 |
3.56 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00
represents a perfect
score for a question, unless
noted otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours
are convenient |
3.68 |
3.56 |
3.79 |
| 2.Size
is adequate |
3.74 |
3.75 |
3.73 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.74 |
3.72 |
3.76 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.77 |
3.69 |
3.85 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.74 |
3.66 |
3.82 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.72 |
3.66 |
3.79 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.72 |
3.69 |
3.73 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.75 |
3.75 |
3.73 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.72 |
3.69 |
3.76 |
| 7. Progress was monitored |
3.77 |
3.75 |
3.79 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.66 |
3.63 |
3.70 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.29 |
1.29 |
1.29 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.47 |
3.39 |
3.55 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.66 |
3.65 |
3.67 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.47 |
3.50 |
3.44 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.66 |
3.69 |
3.64 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.68 |
3.59 |
3.76 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.68 |
3.66 |
3.70 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.42 |
3.53 |
3.36 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.68 |
3.69 |
3.67 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.64 |
3.52 |
3.76 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.19 |
2.03 |
2.34 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.54 |
3.55 |
3.53 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.58 |
3.59 |
3.64 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.11 |
1.03 |
1.18 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.66 |
3.66 |
3.67 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.06 |
9.08 |
9.04 |
2003-04 Results
Athletes were asked to rate
their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score
|
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
1.93 |
2.05 |
1.86 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.51 |
3.60 |
3.41 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00
represents a perfect
score for a question, unless
noted otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours
are convenient |
3.70 |
3.71 |
3.69 |
| 2.Size
is adequate |
3.83 |
3.88 |
3.77 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.84 |
3.90 |
3.76 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.87 |
3.88 |
3.86 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.81 |
3.79 |
3.83 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.88 |
3.95 |
3.80 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.86 |
3.90 |
3.80 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.87 |
3.90 |
3.83 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.86 |
3.90 |
3.82 |
| 7. Progress was monitored |
3.81 |
3.93 |
3.74 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.79 |
3.79 |
3.79 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.28 |
1.24 |
1.31 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.63 |
3.57 |
3.67 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.84 |
3.93 |
3.74 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.67 |
3.71 |
3.57 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.78 |
3.86 |
3.68 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.81 |
3.90 |
3.69 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.86 |
3.93 |
3.77 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.70 |
3.65 |
3.74 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.82 |
3.86 |
3.77 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.79 |
3.80 |
3.77 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.26 |
2.16 |
2.38 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.58 |
3.59 |
3.56 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.78 |
3.95 |
3.63 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.09 |
1.00 |
1.21 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.78 |
3.83 |
3.71 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.16 |
9.24 |
9.06 |
2002-03 Results
Athletes were asked to rate
their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score
|
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.47 |
3.42 |
3.51 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00 represents
a perfect
score for a question, unless
noted otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours
are convenient |
3.86 |
3.84 |
3.89 |
| 2.Size
is adequate |
3.80 |
3.86 |
3.71 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.83 |
3.86 |
3.79 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.92 |
3.91 |
3.93 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.76 |
3.79 |
3.72 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.86 |
3.86 |
3.83 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.80 |
3.86 |
3.71 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.82 |
3.88 |
3.71 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.81 |
3.86 |
3.75 |
| 7.Progress was monitored |
3.87 |
3.88 |
3.89 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.62 |
3.53 |
3.75 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.39 |
1.38 |
1.39 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.29 |
3.31 |
3.25 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.76 |
3.79 |
3.71 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.65 |
3.60 |
3.61 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.75 |
3.79 |
3.68 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.77 |
3.81 |
3.71 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.75 |
3.77 |
3.71 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.42 |
3.49 |
3.32 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.72 |
3.79 |
3.61 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.70 |
3.62 |
3.81 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
1.91 |
1.88 |
1.96 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.51 |
3.51 |
3.50 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.63 |
3.62 |
3.65 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.10 |
1.12 |
1.09 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.82 |
3.79 |
3.86 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.1 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
2001-02 Results
Athletes were asked to rate
their injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score
|
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.47 |
3.51 |
3.47 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00 represents
a perfect
score for a question, unless
noted otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours are
convenient |
3.87 |
3.83 |
3.91 |
| 2.Size is
adequate |
3.91 |
3.90 |
3.91 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.91 |
3.93 |
3.89 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.92 |
3.93 |
3.91 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.83 |
3.88 |
3.78 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.89 |
3.95 |
3.83 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.80 |
3.90 |
3.68 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.93 |
3.95 |
3.91 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.86 |
3.95 |
3.75 |
| 7.Progress was monitored |
3.83 |
3.93 |
3.77 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.52 |
3.60 |
3.49 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.28 |
1.25 |
1.32 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.38 |
3.50 |
3.35 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.85 |
3.88 |
3.83 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.68 |
3.78 |
3.57 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.83 |
3.85 |
3.80 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.83 |
3.85 |
3.79 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.87 |
3.93 |
3.79 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.56 |
3.63 |
3.47 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.75 |
3.83 |
3.68 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.74 |
3.85 |
3.62 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.19 |
2.43 |
1.91 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.61 |
3.63 |
3.58 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.61 |
3.80 |
3.53 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.05 |
1.07 |
1.03 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.88 |
3.90 |
3.85 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.3 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
2000-01 Results
(First Survey
Results from the New Athletic Training Facility)
Athletes were asked to rate their injury severity before and after
rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score
|
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
1.91 |
2.09 |
1.75 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.68 |
3.77 |
3.60 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00 represents
a perfect
score for a question, unless noted
otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours are
convenient |
3.77 |
3.81 |
3.73 |
| 2.Size is adequate |
3.90 |
3.92 |
3.88 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.87 |
3.89 |
3.85 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.88 |
3.91 |
3.85 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.82 |
3.86 |
3.78 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.89 |
3.91 |
3.88 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.83 |
3.83 |
3.83 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.87 |
3.91 |
3.83 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.84 |
3.88 |
3.80 |
| 7.Progress was monitored |
3.90 |
3.97 |
3.88 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.83 |
3.81 |
3.85 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.09 |
1.11 |
1.07 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.63 |
3.55 |
3.76 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.84 |
3.89 |
3.80 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.68 |
3.75 |
3.61 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.81 |
3.83 |
3.78 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.83 |
3.86 |
3.80 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.87 |
3.89 |
3.85 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.66 |
3.61 |
3.71 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.75 |
3.69 |
3.83 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.88 |
3.91 |
3.85 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.12 |
2.00 |
2.22 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.57 |
3.56 |
3.58 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.78 |
3.86 |
3.76 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.09 |
1.08 |
1.10 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.74 |
3.83 |
3.66 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.3 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
1999-00
Results
Athletes were asked to rate their
injury severity before and after rehab.
1.00 represents unable to play, 4.00 represents full recovery
| Topic
|
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Pre-Rehab rating of injury severity |
1.82 |
1.86 |
1.75 |
| Post-Rehab rating of injury severity |
3.57 |
3.56 |
3.58 |
Responses were set up on a scale of 1 through 4. 4.00 represents
a perfect
score for a question, unless noted
otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours are convenient |
3.59 |
3.53 |
3.64 |
| 2.Size is adequate |
3.00 |
2.95 |
3.08 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.29 |
3.27 |
3.33 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.86 |
3.88 |
3.85 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.76 |
3.75 |
3.78 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.80 |
3.86 |
3.73 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.81 |
3.82 |
3.80 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.83 |
3.84 |
3.82 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.84 |
3.91 |
3.75 |
| 7.Progress was monitored |
3.76 |
3.91 |
3.73 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.74 |
3.68 |
3.83 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.23 |
1.27 |
1.16 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.34 |
3.40 |
3.34 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.73 |
3.77 |
3.68 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.70 |
3.64 |
3.53 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.70 |
3.73 |
3.65 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.65 |
3.64 |
3.67 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.73 |
3.79 |
3.64 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.44 |
3.54 |
3.30 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.75 |
3.79 |
3.70 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.68 |
3.67 |
3.70 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.15 |
2.07 |
2.26 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.55 |
3.59 |
3.50 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.67 |
3.70 |
3.63 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.18 |
1.15 |
1.23 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.69 |
3.71 |
3.67 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
Top
1998-99
Results
Responses were set up on a scale of
1 through 4. 4.00 represents a perfect
score for a question, unless noted
otherwise.
|
Topic |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| Athletic Training Room- |
|
|
|
| 1.Hours are convenient |
3.53 |
3.43 |
3.67 |
| 2.Size is adequate |
3.08 |
3.03 |
3.15 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.31 |
3.27 |
3.37 |
| Evaluations- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.83 |
3.84 |
3.81 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.70 |
3.73 |
3.67 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.78 |
3.86 |
3.67 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.80 |
3.78 |
3.81 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.80 |
3.81 |
3.78 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.80 |
3.86 |
3.70 |
| 7.Progress was monitored |
3.81 |
3.92 |
3.67 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Total Score |
Women |
Men |
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.73 |
3.70 |
3.78 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.30 |
1.35 |
1.23 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.34 |
3.34 |
3.37 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.70 |
3.73 |
3.67 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.61 |
3.68 |
3.52 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.69 |
3.73 |
3.63 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.65 |
3.68 |
3.62 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.73 |
3.84 |
3.58 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.42 |
3.49 |
3.33 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.73 |
3.70 |
3.78 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.71 |
3.75 |
3.67 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.21 |
2.08 |
2.38 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.54 |
3.54 |
3.54 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.69 |
3.73 |
3.63 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.22 |
1.19 |
1.26 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.65 |
3.68 |
3.62 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
Top
1997-98
Results
Responses were set up on a scale of
1 through 4. 4.00 represents a perfect
score for a question, unless noted
otherwise.
|
Topic
|
Score
|
| Athletic
Training Room- |
|
| 1.Hours are convenient |
3.41 |
| 2.Size is adequate |
1.93 |
| 3.Equipment is adequate |
3.44 |
| Evaluations- |
Score
|
| 1.Prompt Initial Care |
3.93 |
| 2.Wait was minimal |
3.80 |
| 3.Thorough injury assessment |
3.76 |
| 4.Concerns were addressed |
3.74 |
| 5.Began a corrective plan of action |
3.80 |
| 6.Re-evaluated at a later date |
3.81 |
| 7.Progress was monitored |
3.78 |
| Rehabilitation- |
Score
|
| 1.Rehab was beneficial |
3.67 |
| 2.Rehab was useless (perfect score 1.0) |
1.12 |
| 3.Confident Return to play |
3.39 |
| 4.Had input in your injury care |
3.72 |
| 5.Rehab was monitored and adapted |
3.63 |
| 6.Staff answered questions |
3.84 |
| 7.Staff is dependable |
3.70 |
| 8.Staff is valuable |
3.70 |
| 9.Pushed to work hard |
3.51 |
| 10.Instructed on rehab exercises |
3.75 |
| 11.Improved from initial injury state |
3.66 |
| 12.Could have progressed faster (1.0) |
2.06 |
| 13.Condition was followed up |
3.52 |
| 14.Care was satisfactory |
3.51 |
| 15.Care was unsatisfactory (1.0) |
1.06 |
| 16.Enjoyable atmosphere |
3.74 |
| Overall Experience Rating (1-10 Scale) |
9.1 |
Top
|