#100, July 1, 2006
From Ibeza to the Norfolk Broads
Hunky Dory is alright! Actually, it is more than that. It is one of those ten albums that one would want to have on that very limited-memory Ipod which one would be forced to take onto that desert island where one would be shipwrecked simply so that one could indicate which album one really liked – today. Because, if one was shipwrecked on a different day, the contents of that limited-memory Ipod would look somewhat different. But today, at least, Hunky Dory is Top Ten.
Why? Surely there are better albums around. Surely there are better David Bowie albums also – Ziggy Stardust, for example. And, indeed, one would have to admit that some of the songs on Ziggy Stardust (ÒFive Years,Ó ÒSuffragette City,Ó ÒZiggy StardustÓ) are superior to many of the songs on Hunky Dory. Possibly all of the music is of a better quality, more polished, on Ziggy as well. But Ziggy Stardust, in the end, is pulled down by being a concept album; some of the songsÕ words (though not those of the aforementioned ones, of course) end up seeming pretty trite and in many instances donÕt live up to the quality of the music they are accompanying (ÒThereÕs a Starman, waiting in the skyÉÓ etc.). The songs donÕt really stand up without the somewhat contrived, and yet inexplicable, concept. [I am willing to be convinced otherwise.]
But it isnÕt just the negatives associated with other albums like Ziggy and Aladdin Sane that leaves Hunky Dory on our limited-memory Ipod as we head island-wards. Hunky Dory is phenomenal at the level of the music, but also at the level of ideas. While Ziggy Stardust appears as a modernist piece of escapism – in other words, while it doesnÕt conform to the usual dichotomies of social conflict, which means it transcends the Modern also, it merely posits a sci-fi positivism and study of commercialism in its place – Hunky Dory challenges the modernist edifice in its entirety. It is a supreme piece of post-modern, while still pre-modem, scholarship.
Its best known song, in fact the only one that makes it onto the Bowie greatest hits compilations, is ÒChanges.Ó The song is perhaps too well known for its own good, and its words donÕt get a good airing as a consequence. In the pop music world it is not a bad ditty. Attached to the album, it is an interesting manifesto that helps account for all that follows. It is obviously about change, but it is also about change that doesnÕt lead anywhere in particular. You have Òthe children that you spit on/who try to change their worldÓ who are Òimmune to your consultation,Ó so donÕt try to co-opt them; but you also have the warning to Òlook out you rock and rollersÓ since we all get older.
What Hunky Dory as a whole feels most like is a post-modern version of ÒPictures at an Exhibition.Ó Except, instead of Mussorgsky wandering around his friendÕs art exhibit and writing musical impressions of what he sees, one has David Bowie tramping through the cultural landscape of early 1970s Britain and the United States and creating songs that sum up the state of the art. Thus each piece is able to be thought of collectively as part of an album, and separately as a work of art. Thus, there is the free-associating ÒEight Line Poem:Ó
Tactful cactus by
your window
Surveys the prairie
of your room
Mobile spins to its
collision
Clara puts her head
between her paws
They've
opened shops down west side
Will the cacti find a
home
But the key to the
city
Is in the sun that
pins the branches to the sky
which is sheer brilliance. Then you have the surreal genius of
ÒQuicksand:Ó
I'm closer to the
golden dawn
Immersed in Crowley's
uniform
Of imagery
I'm living in a
silent film
Portraying Himmler's
sacred realm
Of dream
reality
I'm frightened by the
total goal
Drawing to the ragged
hole
And I ain't got the
power, anymore
No I ain't got the
power anymore
I'm the twisted name
on Garbo's eyes
Living proof of
Churchill's lies
I'm destiny
I'm torn between the
light and dark
Where others see
their targetÕs
Divine
symmetry
Should I kiss the
viper's fang
Or herald loud the
death of man
I'm sinking in the
quicksand of my thought
And i ain't got the
power anymore
Not surprisingly, the chorusÕs demand
that we not have faith in ourselves has much traction after such verses!
Two more to conjure with, both very
self-conscious and intelligent songs for someone trying to grapple with the
impact of modern art and music and their relation to social change: ÒAndy
WarholÓ and ÒSong for Bob Dylan.Ó
The former with its chorus of
Andy Warhol looks a
scream
Hang him on my
wall
Andy Warhol, silver
screen
Can't tell them apart
at all
speaks for itself.
The latter is very interesting
also. Here you have someone who
has renamed himself – as a result of the popularity of the Monkeys, an
American TV show about a band with an English lead singer modeled on the
English Beatles (I would say influenced by ÒHard DayÕs NightÓ and ÒHelpÓ) – who
chooses a name from American legend (should the name be pronounced Bow-ie as in
bending, or Bow-ie as in tying bows? who knows) – and who then comments on another
artist who has refashioned himself – giving up a German Jewish [?] name
for one taken, I imagine, from the first name of a Welsh poet (though thatÕs a
guess) – of such things is post-World War II transnationalism
(Anglo-American style) made. Parse
out that sentence, if you will, and pass it on if you must!
The first verse talks about the impact
of Bob DylanÕs music and it makes gestures to the 1960s counter-culture:
Ah, hear this Robert
Zimmerman
I wrote a song for
you
About a strange young
man called Dylan
With a voice like
sand and glue
Some words of
truthful vengeance
They could pin us to
the floor
Brought a few more
people on
And put the fear in a
whole lot more
But somewhere along the way people
seem to have lost the plot –
You gave your heart
to every bedsit room
At least a picture on
the wall
And you sat behind a
million pair of eyes
And told them how they
saw
Then we lost your
train of thought
The paintings are all
your own
While troubles are
rising
We'd rather be
scared
Together than alone
and thus Hunky Dory, released at the
end of 1971, becomes another harbinger of the end of social reform and protest,
and the arrival of whatever it is that you think the 1970s represented. But the album is one that retains its
freshness and intellectual power long after most of the work produced at the
same time sounds dated and pseudo-intellectual.
Anyway, who hasnÕt become Òchameleon, comedian, corinthian and caricatureÓ?